nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted
From: Colm MacCarthaigh <colm () stdlib net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 07:03:29 +0100
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 02:53:52AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
ipv6 load balancers exist, one's current load balancer is/may probably not be up to the task.my favourite load balancer is OSPF ECMP, since there are no extra boxes, just the routers and switches and hosts i'd have to have anyway. quagga ospf6d works great, and currently lacks only a health check API.
If you're load-balancing N nodes, and 1 node dies, the distribution hash is re-calced and TCP sessions to all N are terminated simultaneously. -- Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: colm+pgp () stdlib net
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 transition work was RE: NANOG 40 agenda posted JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joel Jaeggli (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Colm MacCarthaigh (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Colm MacCarthaigh (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Joe Abley (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Paul Vixie (Jun 04)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Matt Peterson (Jun 05)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Donald Stahl (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Nathan Ward (Jun 03)
- Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted Bernhard Schmidt (Jun 04)