nanog mailing list archives
Re: [ppml] too many variables
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:42:59 -0400
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:42:23 +0000 Paul Vixie <paul () vix com> wrote:
... is that system level (combinatorial) effects would limit Internet routing long before moore's law could do so.It is an easy derivative/proxy for the system level effect is all. Bandwidth for updates (inter and intra system) are another choking point but folks tend to be even less aware of those than cpu.is bandwidth the only consideration? number of graph nodes and number of advertised endpoints and churn rate per endpoint don't enter into the limits? at what system size does speed of light begin to enter into the equation?
Right. What is the computational complexity of the current algorithm? --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Current thread:
- Re: [ppml] too many variables, (continued)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Cat Okita (Aug 13)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Barry Shein (Aug 15)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Scott Whyte (Aug 13)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Leo Bicknell (Aug 14)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Adrian Chadd (Aug 14)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables sthaug (Aug 14)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Bruce M Simpson (Aug 24)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Paul Vixie (Aug 10)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables vijay gill (Aug 10)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Paul Vixie (Aug 10)
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 10)
- Message not available
- Re: [ppml] too many variables Joel Jaeggli (Aug 13)
- Message not available
- Re: [ppml] too many variables vijay gill (Aug 10)
- Message not available
- RE: [ppml] too many variables michael.dillon (Aug 12)