nanog mailing list archives

Re: [ppml] too many variables


From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:28:44 -0700


John Paul Morrison wrote:
Can't any network problem can be solved by adding another layer of
indirection?

Don't all the various nodes in a system simply "disappear" when another
technology comes along to organize, replace and manage the problem
differently? With iBGP there's been confederations and route-reflectors
to divide the problem into smaller pieces, even MPLS to remove a lot of
the scalability issues.

But perhaps in the future, after many more consolidations and
bankruptcies, there may only be a couple of major carriers left. This
would solve a lot of BGP decision making algorithms.

Not if one of them is covad...

You'd either go with the Red ISP or the Blue ISP, just like politics!

Leaving most stake holders poorly served just as they are by blue party
red party. I don't think hoping for a high level of monopoly
consolidation to address the issue of table growth is reasonable.

As an enterprise or individual I'm still going to choose both meaning my
stub-AS and address space will continue to consume slots in the routing
table.




Paul Vixie wrote:
... is that system level (combinatorial) effects would limit Internet
routing long before moore's law could do so.
      
It is an easy derivative/proxy for the system level effect is all. Bandwidth
for updates (inter and intra system) are another choking point but folks
tend to be even less aware of those than cpu.
    

is bandwidth the only consideration?  number of graph nodes and number of
advertised endpoints and churn rate per endpoint don't enter into the limits?
at what system size does speed of light begin to enter into the equation?

(note, as i told geoff huston: if it seems like john scudder's outbound BGP
announcement compression observations are relevant, or that moore's law is
relevant, then you're misunderstanding my question or i'm asking it wrong.)
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy
Mailing List (PPML () arin net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN Member Services
Help Desk at info () arin net if you experience any issues.
  


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy
Mailing List (PPML () arin net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN Member Services
Help Desk at info () arin net if you experience any issues.


Current thread: