Re: icmp rpf

[virendra rode // <virendra.rode () gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Mark Kent wrote:
> virendra rode wrote:
> > > This is yet another reason one shouldn't rely on pings & traceroutes to
> > > perform reachability analysis.
>
> So, you're in the "traceroute is not important" camp?
> (you'll note that in my email I did ask whether we think 
> traceroute is important)
- ----------------------------
I'm sure its important. All I'm saying is, icmp can get rate-limited
(many times it does) which could possibly lead to packet loss and even
drops while traversing hops.


regards,
/virendra


> Mark Smith wrote:
> > > The non-announcers, because they're also breaking PMTUD.
>
> Really?   How?   Remember, we're not talking about RFC1918 space,
> where there is a BCP that says we should filter it at the edge.
> We're talking about public IP space, that just doesn't happen to be
> announced outside of a particular AS.
>
> Thanks,
> -mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFFyejpbZvCIJx1bcRAsFXAKDokAbujtIiuvGDXss2Tt5U3CXElQCgkpKG
UaS6MDxtWKjdbiLewujDs/Q=
=qgo2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----