nanog mailing list archives
Re: icmp rpf
From: Mark Smith <nanog () fa1c52f96c54f7450e1ffb215f29991e nosense org>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:38:12 +0930
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Mark Kent <mark () noc mainstreet net> wrote:
If so, which of these two nets is unreasonable in their actions/policies?
The non-announcers, because they're also breaking PMTUD. Regards, Mark. -- "Sheep are slow and tasty, and therefore must remain constantly alert." - Bruce Schneier, "Beyond Fear"
Current thread:
- icmp rpf Mark Kent (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf Mark Smith (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf Michael . Dillon (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf virendra rode // (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf Mark Kent (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf Roland Dobbins (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf virendra rode // (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf Mark Smith (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf Mark Kent (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf Chris Adams (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf william(at)elan.net (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf Tony Rall (Sep 26)
- Re: icmp rpf Mark Kent (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf Mark Smith (Sep 24)