nanog mailing list archives
Re: icmp rpf
From: "Bill Stewart" <nonobvious () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:04:37 -0700
Possible approach for small.net - ok, you know that big.net will drop any packets sourced from x.x.x.x if there's no route there (loose uRPF for downstream ISPs like small.net, strict uRPF for end-users.) So give them a route. Either give them a route on one of your direct interfaces to them, and then get rid of the packets by ACL or by null-routing it, or if that causes too much trouble, get yourself a 56kbps line from a spare router and advertise it from there.
Current thread:
- Re: icmp rpf, (continued)
- Re: icmp rpf virendra rode // (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf Mark Kent (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf Roland Dobbins (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf virendra rode // (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf Mark Smith (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf Mark Kent (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf Chris Adams (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf william(at)elan.net (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf Tony Rall (Sep 26)
- Re: icmp rpf Jared Mauch (Sep 26)
- Re: icmp rpf Mark Kent (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf Bill Stewart (Sep 27)
- Re: icmp rpf virendra rode // (Sep 24)
- Re: icmp rpf Adrian Chadd (Sep 25)
- New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 25)
- Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] Joe Maimon (Sep 25)
- Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] Mark Smith (Sep 25)
- RE: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] Berkman, Scott (Sep 25)
- Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 25)
- RE: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] David Temkin (Sep 25)
- Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 25)