nanog mailing list archives
Re: shim6 @ NANOG
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 18:52:42 -0800
On Mar 5, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
Very little time has been spent on shim6 so far. Far more time before that was spent on multi6, which considered many different approaches to multi-homing.
Spending time in and of itself has no value, you're entirely correct. Spending time to come up with a solution which does not engage in problem-shifting routing onto the nodes, fixed geographic allocations (another nonstarter for reasons which have been elucidated previously), and other schemes which ignore customer requirements and correspond to operational and business realities - does- have value, and that's what's being proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> // 408.527.6376 voice Everything has been said. But nobody listens. -- Roger Shattuck
Current thread:
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG, (continued)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 05)
- Message not available
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Christopher L. Morrow (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 05)
- Message not available
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 06)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Joe Abley (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Stephen Sprunk (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Joe Abley (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Roland Dobbins (Mar 05)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 06)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Owen DeLong (Mar 06)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 07)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Paul Jakma (Mar 07)
- RE: shim6 @ NANOG Tony Hain (Mar 07)
- RE: shim6 @ NANOG Paul Jakma (Mar 07)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Owen DeLong (Mar 07)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG John Curran (Mar 07)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Edward B. DREGER (Mar 07)
- Re: shim6 @ NANOG Owen DeLong (Mar 07)