nanog mailing list archives

Re: Multi-6 [WAS: OT - Vint Cerf joins Google]


From: David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:24:31 -0700 (PDT)




--- Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se> wrote:

The "shimming" model is a way to solve this by the
endsystems knowing 
about multihoming, instead of the network. I
personally think this is a 
better idea and scales much better. Let's have the
network moving packets 
as its primary goal, not solving "how do I reach
this prefix" equations.

Waitaminute - isn't the whole *purpose* of layer 3
that the network makes these routing decisions?  

If there are N routers in an ISP, I would expect the
ISP to connect to X endsystems, where 10N < X < 1000N.
How does knowing about X endsystems scale better than
knowing about N intermediate systems?

Am I missing something here?

David Barak
http://www.listentothefranchise.com


                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


Current thread: