nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering
From: eric-list-nanog () catastrophe net
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 14:08:00 -0500
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 06:01:15 -0400, Richard A Steenbergen proclaimed...
I guess the earlier reports of (3)'s lack of testicular fortitude may have been exagerated after all. :)
Luckily, many of us have ipv6 tunnels that managed to help us get around this. See, ipv6 has a purpose, afterall! :-)
Current thread:
- Cogent/Level 3 drama, why it's the best news of the day!, (continued)
- Cogent/Level 3 drama, why it's the best news of the day! Peter Kranz (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering David Barak (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Christopher Woodfield (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Jon Lewis (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Christopher Woodfield (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering David Sinn (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering James (Oct 05)
- (de)peering bmanning (Oct 05)
- Re: (de)peering Pekka Savola (Oct 05)
- Re: (de)peering Robert E . Seastrom (Oct 06)
- RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Curran (Oct 05)