Re: IPv6 news

[Paul Vixie <paul () vix com>]

# > but when similar things were proposed at other meetings, somebody always
# > said "no! we have to have end-to- end, and if we'd wanted
# > nat-around-every-net we'd've stuck with IPv4."
# 
# Is VJ compression considered a violation of the "end-to-end" principle?
# 
# Or perhaps I misunderstand (yet again).

vj is a framing protocol.  IP goes in, IP comes out.  univerality is retained.