nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent move without renumbering
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 13:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, William Allen Simpson wrote: > I remember presenting a paper at IETF over a decade ago about assigning > IP addresses to exchanges instead of carriers. Yes, that's been debunked many times over at this point. Still, it occurs to someone new, periodically. The problem is that the ISPs which matter are at more than one IX, so it results in massively fragmented routing, completely defeating aggregation. The cure is worse than the disease. -Bill
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering, (continued)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Lamar Owen (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Leo Bicknell (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Deepak Jain (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Niels Bakker (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Deepak Jain (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 06)
- Cogent move without renumbering (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) William Allen Simpson (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering Paul Vixie (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering Bill Woodcock (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering Randy Bush (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering Randy Bush (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Oct 08)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Oct 08)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering Paul Vixie (Oct 08)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering William Allen Simpson (Oct 09)