nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering
From: tony sarendal <dualcyclone () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:43:21 +0100
Is being a tier-1 now a good or bad sales argument when selling
internet access ?
--
Tony Sarendal - dualcyclone () gmail com
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering), (continued)
- Re: Cogent move without renumbering (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Tony Li (Oct 09)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Lamar Owen (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Leo Bicknell (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Oct 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Mike Tancsa (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Warren Kumari (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Douglas Dever (Oct 05)
- RE: Cogent/Level 3 depeering David Schwartz (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering tony sarendal (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Randy Bush (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Golding (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering tony sarendal (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 06)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering tony sarendal (Oct 06)