nanog mailing list archives

Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434


From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 22:28:08 +0000 (GMT)


On Wed, 11 May 2005, Jon Lewis wrote:


On Wed, 11 May 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:

Is there still justification for denying transit for ms-sql slammer ports?

probably not, but that's really a local-to-your-asn decision.

I dunno about that.  I know it was more than a year ago, but at NANOG
Miami, someone brought either SQL slammer or a vulnerable laptop and
killed the network for a while.  Running tcpdump on my notebook, I noticed
fairly constant slammer probes while there.  We still block it here, and
the last time we accidentally removed that filter, a colo customer was
promptly infected.

excellent, you made the choice for your asn... Joe should evaluate his
network's risk/behaviour/profile and see if it's still relevant for him...
much like he evaluates his requirements to recieve email from folks via
the use of the SPEWS list, which blocks my mail servers :)


Current thread: