nanog mailing list archives

Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434


From: Chip Mefford <cpm () well com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 13:26:57 -0400


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Joe Maimon wrote:
|
| Is there still justification for denying transit for ms-sql slammer ports?

on my "at work" small network, slammer (or slammer like) traffic is
still around 2% of inbound blocked traffic. (just a dead end off
of asn 6467)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCgkBh0STXFHxUucwRAjQ6AJsFHzi9/bof9L7kM+6pFfybkzNMJwCffZ2+
76QYWAivNlOOT7DREixKMgU=
=HIV3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: