nanog mailing list archives

Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434

From: Jeff Rosowski <rosowskij () ie ymp gov>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 09:47:30 -0700 (PDT)

Is there still justification for denying transit for ms-sql slammer ports?

Well MS-SQL Worm propagation attempts and MS-SQL version overflow attemptsaccount for 62% of the activity on our Internet facing IDS.

Current thread:

Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Joe Maimon (May 11)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Christopher L. Morrow (May 11)
  - Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Jon Lewis (May 11)
    - Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Christopher L. Morrow (May 11)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Jeff Rosowski (May 11)
  - Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Gadi Evron (May 11)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Chip Mefford (May 11)
  - Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Jeff Kell (May 11)
    - Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Hank Nussbacher (May 11)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Joe Maimon (May 11)
  - Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Gadi Evron (May 11)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Brian Russo (May 12)
  - Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Valdis . Kletnieks (May 12)
    - Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Brian Russo (May 12)
  - Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 John Kristoff (May 12)

(Thread continues...)