nanog mailing list archives

Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?


From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 () dcrocker net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:39:59 -0700


 In part the problem was 'legal' (versus technical)...the folks involved
 in the working list from MS...technical people, offered ongoing
 reassurance that the as-yet-unpublished patent apps were benign, that

Folks,

For all the reasons already cited in this thread, it's clear that legal
concerns were a factor.

However the reality is that the IETF working group was not converging on
consensus and showed no ability to repair this fatal barrier.  The legal
issues were part of this, but it is far from obvious that fixing the legal
issues would have gotten a better outcome.

Besides the criticisms of the basic path registration (somewhat akin to
registering source routes) schemes used by SPF and Sender-ID, those two
different specs have different constituencies and were not overly
successful as merging.

  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net



Current thread: