nanog mailing list archives
Re: ATT CDPD
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:11:03 -0400
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 01:38:44AM -0400, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Alex Rubenstein wrote:AMPS, as I understand it, is required to be around until 1/1/2007, as mandated by tge FCC.I think the date actually got pushed back to '08, but I've not heard anything about requiring CDPD.
Sorry; I didn't mean to imply that I thought the FCC was requiring them to keep or dump CDPD. What I was trying to get across was that, there being a large installed base for CDPD, they wouldn't dump it completely for sometime for a replacement, unless they had to -- and not having to maintain the associated RF and antennas for AMPS, they would no longer be able to cost-justify keeping it after AMPS went down. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com Designer Baylink RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 If you can read this... thank a system administrator. Or two. --me
Current thread:
- ATT CDPD Ronald W. Jean (Jul 08)
- Message not available
- Re: ATT CDPD Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 08)
- Re: ATT CDPD Alex Rubenstein (Jul 09)
- Re: ATT CDPD Steven J. Sobol (Jul 09)
- Message not available
- Re: ATT CDPD Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 10)
- Re: ATT CDPD Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 08)
- Message not available
- Re: ATT CDPD Steven J. Sobol (Jul 09)
- Re: ATT CDPD Todd Vierling (Jul 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fw: ATT CDPD Ronald W. Jean (Jul 08)
- Fw: ATT CDPD Ronald W. Jean (Jul 08)
- RE: ATT CDPD Kuhtz, Christian (Jul 11)