nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Michael Loftis <mloftis () wgops com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:29:06 -0600
--On July 9, 2005 10:42:57 AM -0700 Alexei Roudnev <alex () relcom net> wrote:
LC can hold only 20,000 ACTIVE routes., and ask central system if it needs more., How many ACTIVE routes are used in any CORE router? 0.1% or CORE? 2% of CORE? Again, today it is not technical issue anymore.
Caches arent' necessarily a good idea again because of the miss issue and at OC192 speeds it's nuts....you pretty much have to carry a full table because if you don't the first time you get a DDoS or a DoS with lots of forged sources or dests flowing through your router it'll blow up.
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 09)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Lesher (Jul 09)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Michael Loftis (Jul 10)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott McGrath (Jul 07)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Meyer (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Eric Rescorla (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Abley (Jul 06)