nanog mailing list archives
Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:12:37 +0530
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:43:05 +0000, Alex Bligh <alex () alex org uk> wrote:
--On 18 February 2005 08:32 +0000 Simon Waters <simonw () zynet net> wrote:Whilst I can appreciate that Kornet may have issues with a lot of broadband users, but the other big Korean company seems to have it solved. What I see is what appear to be (using whois data!) US companies buying transit from them.How are US companies with Korean offices meant to take connectivity then?
I think what Simon has been seeing is the Wholesalebandwidth AS -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts, (continued)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dave Crocker (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dave O'Shea (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Gadi Evron (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts william(at)elan.net (Feb 17)
- Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Simon Waters (Feb 18)
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Alex Bligh (Feb 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 19)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Scott Weeks (Feb 17)
- RE: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Gadi Evron (Feb 17)