nanog mailing list archives
Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts
From: Simon Waters <simonw () zynet net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:32:41 +0000
On Thursday 17 Feb 2005 8:11 pm, Dave Crocker wrote:
Any chance of trying to get some granularity to this? As I understand their operation, there are enormous differences among the operations in different provinces.
220.175 550 ChinaNet Jiangxi not wanted here see SBL12656 Persistent email abuse that led to the email server being overwhelmed on occaisons, we introduce these manually, and cross reference them against the big block list databases to ensure it is a "persistent" issue. We use blocking only to protect our own SMTP service not for filtering purposes. Kornet Whilst I can appreciate that Kornet may have issues with a lot of broadband users, but the other big Korean company seems to have it solved. What I see is what appear to be (using whois data!) US companies buying transit from them. I'm no routing guru, but I assume it must be pretty obvious to Kornet if some small US company starts buying transit from them (rather than say some local US telecom provider) that they want it for nefarious purposes?! Or is there something going on here that makes Kornet look unduely bad. Anyone got a handle on what is going on in that regard.
Current thread:
- ChinaNet Contacts Jon R. Kibler (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dave Crocker (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dave O'Shea (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Gadi Evron (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts william(at)elan.net (Feb 17)
- Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Simon Waters (Feb 18)
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Alex Bligh (Feb 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 19)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Scott Weeks (Feb 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ChinaNet Contacts Hannigan, Martin (Feb 17)
- RE: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Gadi Evron (Feb 17)