nanog mailing list archives
Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts
From: Alex Bligh <alex () alex org uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:43:05 +0000
--On 18 February 2005 08:32 +0000 Simon Waters <simonw () zynet net> wrote:
Whilst I can appreciate that Kornet may have issues with a lot of broadband users, but the other big Korean company seems to have it solved. What I see is what appear to be (using whois data!) US companies buying transit from them.
How are US companies with Korean offices meant to take connectivity then? Alex
Current thread:
- ChinaNet Contacts Jon R. Kibler (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dave Crocker (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dave O'Shea (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Gadi Evron (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts william(at)elan.net (Feb 17)
- Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Simon Waters (Feb 18)
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Alex Bligh (Feb 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 19)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Scott Weeks (Feb 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ChinaNet Contacts Hannigan, Martin (Feb 17)
- RE: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Gadi Evron (Feb 17)