nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verizon wins MCI
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:14:05 -0500
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 06:56:54PM +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
we aim to please? or was there some hidden meaning to your email/troll?
1. I didn't realize that accurately reporting the facts was now considered a "troll". Fascinating. 2. Nope, there's no hidden meaning -- unless you're someone with the authority, integrity and courage to pull the plug on those 193 spam operations. By close-of-business today would be just fine, thanks. Those of us absorbing the operational costs of dealing with the abuse they're cranking out would really appreciate it. 3. If that made you uncomfortable, you probably don't want to read this: Should MCI Be Profiting From Knowingly Hosting Spam Gangs? http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=158 ---Rsk
Current thread:
- Re: Verizon wins MCI, (continued)
- Re: Verizon wins MCI Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Verizon wins MCI Robert Boyle (Feb 14)
- Re: Verizon wins MCI Alex Rubenstein (Feb 15)
- Re: Verizon wins MCI Mark Radabaugh (Feb 15)
- Re: Verizon wins MCI Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 15)
- Re: Verizon wins MCI Mark Radabaugh (Feb 15)
- Re: Verizon wins MCI Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 15)
- Re: Verizon wins MCI Robert Blayzor (Feb 15)
- Re: Verizon wins MCI Rich Kulawiec (Feb 15)
- Re: Verizon wins MCI Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 15)
- Re: Verizon wins MCI Rich Kulawiec (Feb 15)