nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Mark Prior <mrp () mrp net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:11:39 +1030
Jerry Pasker wrote:
Until there's deep shame, or real financial incentive to not being listed as a member of the dirty 30, nothing is going to happen in terms of aggregation.
I sometimes wonder if this list is seen as some sort of hit parade of potential peers and if that is the case then perhaps another list acknowledging the largest players with the best aggregation might also be in order.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: The Cidr Report, (continued)
- Re: The Cidr Report Warren Kumari, Ph.D, CCIE# 9190 (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Michael Smith (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Warren Kumari, Ph.D, CCIE# 9190 (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Philip Smith (Feb 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Jerry Pasker (Feb 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Aaron Hopkins (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Patrick W Gilmore (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Mark Prior (Feb 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Marc Binderberger (Feb 11)
- RE: The Cidr Report Neil J. McRae (Feb 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Hank Nussbacher (Feb 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Philip Smith (Feb 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Elmar K. Bins (Feb 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Philip Smith (Feb 13)