nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Cidr Report
From: Aaron Hopkins <lists () die net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:20:55 -0800 (PST)
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Jerry Pasker wrote:
Until there's deep shame, or real financial incentive to not being listed as a member of the dirty 30, nothing is going to happen in terms of aggregation.
[...]
Nothing is going to happen unless enough people (ASNs) take a simultaneous, and UNITED stand, and make it painful for those that don't care about the routes they leak to the net.
Similarly, "enough people" won't get involved until there is real financial incentive to do so. Most people won't particularly care about the number of routes in a full table until their equipment becomes unable to handle it. Does anyone have any idea of the routing table size limits of old but still common equipment? I suspect we'll see a lot more interest in routing table size when things start to break. -- Aaron
Current thread:
- RE: The Cidr Report, (continued)
- RE: The Cidr Report Justin Ryburn (Feb 13)
- RE: The Cidr Report Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Warren Kumari, Ph.D, CCIE# 9190 (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Michael Smith (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Warren Kumari, Ph.D, CCIE# 9190 (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Philip Smith (Feb 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Jerry Pasker (Feb 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Aaron Hopkins (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Patrick W Gilmore (Feb 13)
- Re: The Cidr Report Mark Prior (Feb 14)
- Re: The Cidr Report Marc Binderberger (Feb 11)
- RE: The Cidr Report Neil J. McRae (Feb 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Hank Nussbacher (Feb 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Philip Smith (Feb 12)
- Re: The Cidr Report Elmar K. Bins (Feb 14)