nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Cidr Report


From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:30:20 +0000 (GMT)



On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Alexander Koch wrote:

On Sun, 13 February 2005 07:31:16 +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
[..]
There are some business reasons to de-aggregate. Look at some outages
caused by 'routing problems' (someone leaked my /24's to their peers,
peers, peer and my traffic got blackholed, because the public net only
knows me as a /20)

I am surprised you bring such an argument up. While we can
surely agree on this happening on the net, I have yet to
hear from someone saying this is happening more than once
a month or so. Maybe Todd from Renesys has other examples
besides the Yahoo incident.^

if it happens once to you and lasts long enough... I'm not condoning it,
nor saying it's even a valid reason to do it, just pointing out that it
does happen :(


There are multiple reasons for deaggregation aside from 'dumb operator',
some are even 'valid' if you look at them from the protection standpoint.

I won't argue that, but how many ISPs are using this line
of argument? I have not heard anyone yet telling me this,
not in years.


a few have... recently in fact.


Current thread: