nanog mailing list archives
RE: Two Tiered Internet
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:04:46 -0500
[ SNIP ]
This is not directed at Sean, but please -- as a fomer Cisco engineering flunky, I can distinguish between marketing fluff (even when disguised as a 'case study') and real figures, and the truth is, there are no figures, because there is dismal adoption of the services. Go figure. Whatever.
Sean recently joined Cisco marketing hence the quoting of vendor cruft as policy. It would be nice to fess up to that with an @cisco or at least an "I work for Cisco Marketing" disclaimer. -M<
Current thread:
- RE: Two Tiered Internet, (continued)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Schliesser, Benson (Dec 14)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Hannigan, Martin (Dec 14)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Chris Owen (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet JC Dill (Dec 14)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Scott Weeks (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Fergie (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Fergie (Dec 14)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Hannigan, Martin (Dec 14)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Michael Loftis (Dec 19)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- RE: Two Tiered Internet Hannigan, Martin (Dec 15)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Alexander Harrowell (Dec 15)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Blaine Christian (Dec 15)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Fergie (Dec 15)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Alexander Harrowell (Dec 15)
- BTW, have I mentioned my "perfect storm hypothesis"? David Meyer (Dec 15)
- Re: BTW, have I mentioned my "perfect storm hypothesis"? David Meyer (Dec 15)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Alexander Harrowell (Dec 15)