Re: Two Tiered Internet

[Marshall Eubanks <tme () multicasttech com>]

To me, this seems likely to lead to massive consumer dissatisfaction,  
and a disaster of the
magnitude of the recent Sony CD root exploit fiasco.

Typical Pareto distribution models for usage mean that no matter
how popular "tier 1" sites are, a substantial part of the user time  
will be spent on degraded "tier 2" sites.

If these don't work, people will complain. Just imagine for a second  
that cable providers started
a service that meant that every channel not owned by, say, Disney,  
had a bad picture and sound. Would this
be good  for the  cable companies ? Would their customers be happy ?

Of course, based on some recent experience this probably  means that  
this will be adopted enthusiastically.

Regards
Marshall Eubanks

On Dec 14, 2005, at 7:05 AM, Per Heldal wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:12:31 -0800, "Joe McGuckin" <joe () via net> said:
> > What good is 6Mbit DSL from my ISP (say, SBC for example) if only  
> > a small
> > portion of the net (sites that pay for non-degraded access) loads  
> > at a
> > reasonable speed and everything else sucks?
>
> All providers in your market would have to agree to do the same thing.
> Capped services only work for monopoly providers.
>
>
> //per
> --
>   Per Heldal
>   heldal () eml cc