nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:53:26 -0400
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:07:09 BST, Michael.Dillon () btradianz com said:
peering connection. As far as I know, nobody uses QoS over these connections and nobody does MPLS peering over these connections.
There is no network design concept so misguided that absolutely *nobody* is doing it. It's a virtual certainty that somebody out there is either trying to do QoS/MPLS, or thinks(*) they are doing it, in these scenarios. Whether anybody on this list will 'fess up to it is a different question... (*) You know the type - code it in the config file, think it's doing something, and blissfully ignoring the warning/error messages... ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- MPLS or Site2Site VPN Todd Reed (Aug 28)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 28)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Network Fortius (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Martin Hepworth (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Michael . Dillon (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Tony Varriale (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Michael . Dillon (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Kim Onnel (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Henry Yen (Aug 30)