nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN
From: Network Fortius <netfortius () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 07:51:51 -0500
Technology aside (I would definitely prefer MPLS, simply because it may allow me to do more with VoIP quality, than unmanaged site-to- site VPNs), I have not been able to find MPLS providers with lesser costs than dedicated lines, for equivalent port speed. I have looked at MCI, SBC and Sprint, so far ... whom did you find more attractive than T1 providers?
Stef On Aug 28, 2005, at 6:32 PM, Todd Reed wrote:
I’m looking at connecting 15+ multi-state locations together to start forming a private corporate network. The sites are small with 25-30 devices. I want to avoid direct-T1’s due to cost, therefore I’m looking for alternatives. I know I can do site-to- site VPN, but I’ve also heard a lot about MPLS and from what I’ve read, it may be a good option. Over the next year, we will be adding 5-10 more sites, so expansion is important. I’m not planning to do voice, but it may be an option in 2-3 years. If anyone has any suggestions on their experiences, I would greatly appreciate it.Thanks, Todd
Current thread:
- MPLS or Site2Site VPN Todd Reed (Aug 28)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 28)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Network Fortius (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Martin Hepworth (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Michael . Dillon (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Tony Varriale (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Randy Bush (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Michael . Dillon (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Kim Onnel (Aug 30)
- Re: MPLS or Site2Site VPN Henry Yen (Aug 30)