nanog mailing list archives
Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 1 Apr 2005 01:16:50 -0000
"The report that this week decided the ownership of the second most important directory on the Internet has been called into question with the claim that a fundamental element of it is factually incorrect."Apparently, the main criticism is that DENIC developed the core of its operations (the main database) on its own, without hiring consultants.
Well there's your problem. German law makes it much harder to lay off your staff and rehire them as consultants than it is here in the U.S. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure John Levine (Mar 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Alexander Koch (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Bill Woodcock (Apr 01)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Randy Bush (Apr 01)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Elmar K. Bins (Apr 02)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Daniel Roesen (Apr 02)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Bill Woodcock (Apr 01)