nanog mailing list archives
Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure
From: Simon Waters <simonw () zynet net>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:22:34 +0100
Have to admit to being surprised at DENIC poor placing. The only time I did a comparison, DENIC were by far and away the best European TLD maintainers. Okay there wasn't much competition, and I was looking at purely technical aspects of how the TLD were arranged, but the results were so good it suggested people who actually knew what they were doing.
Current thread:
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure John Levine (Mar 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Alexander Koch (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Bill Woodcock (Apr 01)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Randy Bush (Apr 01)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Elmar K. Bins (Apr 02)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Daniel Roesen (Apr 02)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Bill Woodcock (Apr 01)