Re: ULA and RIR cost-recovery

[Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>]

On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 02:42:55PM +0100, Måns Nilsson wrote:
> > The current problem is that the RIR membership has self-selected to a
> > state where they set policies that ensure the end customer has no
> > alternative except to be locked into their provider's address space.
>
> Do note that, IIRC, RIPE had this up for discussion some time ago and opted
> in-session for an "one AS -- one global prefix" solution which was then
> overridden because APNIC and ARIN weren't as impressed by that solution. 
>
> Don't blame Europe ;-) 

This is interesting, didn't know about that. Can you provide any
reference (WG minutes, mailing list archive URL or so)?

That'd be a good starting point to re-visit this.


Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0