Re: A6/DNAME not needed for v6 renumbering [Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]]

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

--On Sunday, November 28, 2004 11:35 PM -0800 "william(at)elan.net" 
<william () elan net> wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Pekka Savola wrote:
>
> > 6.  Acknowledgments
> > [...]
> >     Some took it on themselves to convince the authors that the concept
> >     of network renumbering as a normal or frequent procedure is daft.
> [Note: check spell error - "draft" not "daft"]
No, I think "daft" is the word intended in this case.  It is a synonym
for "incompetent" or "stupid".

I don't happen to agree with it, but, I think that is what was intended.

Owen


--
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.

Attachment: _bin
Description: