nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI
From: Cliff Albert <cliff () oisec net>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:45:33 +0100
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 09:27:40PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
This is good, but it should also happen for ASN's that are already active. An check for active use of the ASN and conforming to the current rules every 6 months should be a nice thing.Good luck trying to get those AS numbers back when they are ok by the rules as per the assignment, just not the current ones. This kind of stuff is why parents want their kids to go to law school.
If such a check rules an ASN as 'not-ok' the owner of the ASN ofcourse always should substantiate his right for an ASN. If the owner can't provide evidence that he uses this ASN rightfully it should be revoked.
Reclaiming AS numbers is a waste of time. We need to move beyond 16 bits at some point anyway.
I think it's not. The problem will not go away then, it will just take longer before it appears again. The policies have to get stricter, there is no point in 'fixing' your problems by not fixing the issue that created them in the first place.
Oh, and just for fun: tell me if you see AS12945 in your routing table. I can assure you that this AS number was assigned and is still used in full compliance with RIPE policies.
* 195.193.163.0/24 195.69.144.125 12945 I As you can see there is evidence to substantiate your claim. That you have no route: object and are advertising UUNet space under another ASN to specific peers is something else. -- Cliff Albert <cliff () oisec net>
Current thread:
- Re: Instant IPv6 PI solution for everyone (Was: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI), (continued)
- Re: Instant IPv6 PI solution for everyone (Was: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI) Jeroen Massar (Nov 29)
- Re: Instant IPv6 PI solution for everyone Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 29)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Cliff Albert (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Henning Brauer (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Owen DeLong (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Cliff Albert (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Owen DeLong (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Daniel Roesen (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Cliff Albert (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Cliff Albert (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Cliff Albert (Nov 28)
- 16 vs 32 bit ASNs [Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI] Pekka Savola (Nov 28)
- Re: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs [Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 29)
- Re: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs [Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI] Daniel Roesen (Nov 29)
- Re: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs [Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI] Cliff Albert (Nov 29)
- Re: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs [Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI] Jeroen Massar (Nov 29)
- Re: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs [Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI] Owen DeLong (Nov 29)
- Re: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs [Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI] Jeroen Massar (Nov 29)
- Re: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs [Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI] Owen DeLong (Nov 29)