nanog mailing list archives

Re: Stupid Ipv6 question...


From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman () es net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:27:57 -0800


From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 19:55:10 -0500


On 20 Nov 2004, at 19:13, Kevin Oberman wrote:

In any case, if the prefix length is >64, routing is done in the
CPU.

Engineers at Juniper seem to be telling me that this is definitively 
not the case for their M- and T-series routers. Which routers were you 
referring to?

Odd. Juniper engineers have assured me that this is th case with M and T
series routers (or any router using the IP2 chip).

To clarify a bit, if the networks are connected, or "direct" in
Juniper-ese. then the CPU is not involved. Only if there is a real
"routing decision" made. OS if you have several connected /126s or /127s
on a single router, you are OK, but if you are truly sub-netting a
prefix longer than a /64 to several routers, then the CPU gets to figure
out where a packet goes.

I'd love to hear this is wrong, but it was confirmed to m by a rather
senor engineer at Juniper, not a JTAC phone droid. Would Tony care to
comment?
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman () es net                       Phone: +1 510 486-8634


Current thread: