nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stupid Ipv6 question...
From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 19:55:10 -0500
On 20 Nov 2004, at 19:13, Kevin Oberman wrote:
In any case, if the prefix length is >64, routing is done in the CPU.
Engineers at Juniper seem to be telling me that this is definitively not the case for their M- and T-series routers. Which routers were you referring to?
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question..., (continued)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Leo Bicknell (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Kevin Loch (Nov 19)
- RE: Stupid Ipv6 question... Scott Morris (Nov 19)
- Re: [nanog] RE: Stupid Ipv6 question... Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Nov 19)
- RE: [nanog] RE: Stupid Ipv6 question... Scott Morris (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... James (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Crist Clark (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Kevin Oberman (Nov 20)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 bmanning (Nov 20)
- RE: Stupid Ipv6 Scott Morris (Nov 20)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Joe Abley (Nov 21)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Kevin Oberman (Nov 22)