nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization?
From: Stefan Mink <mink () schlund net>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 11:21:00 +0200
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:37:23PM +0100, Per Gregers Bilse wrote:
Another issue is that there isn't much point, as far as regular BGP and routing considerations go. Whichever is the best path for a border router is the best path; telling other routers about paths it will not use serves no (or at best very little) point in this context.
what about persistent route oscillations when you use route reflectors? You wouldn't have that problem if you could announce several paths... tschuess Stefan -- Stefan Mink, Schlund+Partner AG (AS 8560) Primary key fingerprint: 389E 5DC9 751F A6EB B974 DC3F 7A1B CF62 F0D4 D2BA
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization?, (continued)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Alexei Roudnev (May 29)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Sam Stickland (May 29)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Per Gregers Bilse (May 28)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Arnold Nipper (May 28)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Per Gregers Bilse (May 28)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Bruce Pinsky (May 28)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Sam Stickland (May 29)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Paul Jakma (May 29)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Sam Stickland (May 29)
- RE: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Michael Hallgren (May 29)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Stefan Mink (May 30)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Per Gregers Bilse (May 30)