nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization?
From: Arnold Nipper <arnold () nipper de>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 18:34:52 +0200
On 28.05.2004 15:37 Per Gregers Bilse wrote:
On May 28, 10:37am, "Sam Stickland" <sam_ml () spacething org> wrote:in this direction. IIRC the problem isn't to do with the route annoucements, it's the route withdrawals. I believe BGP only specifies the prefix being withdrawn and not the path, so if it's advertised multiple paths to a prefix it's impossible to know which has been withdrawn.That is 100% correct, yes. Selective withdrawal is not supported.
Wouldn't Equal Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) solve this? Arnold
Current thread:
- RE: Open Source BGP Route Optimization?, (continued)
- RE: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Burton, Chris (May 25)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Per Gregers Bilse (May 27)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Bruce Pinsky (May 28)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Per Gregers Bilse (May 28)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Andrew - Supernews (May 28)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Sam Stickland (May 29)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Olivier Bonaventure (May 29)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Alexei Roudnev (May 29)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Bruce Pinsky (May 28)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Per Gregers Bilse (May 28)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Arnold Nipper (May 28)
- Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization? Per Gregers Bilse (May 28)