Re: Cisco HFR

[Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>]

Tony Li wrote:

> I've heard the rumor that that would be the first port that they would
> undertake, and that would make some sense.  However, I hope that they
> focus their efforts on stabilizing first and porting second.  No point
> in porting what isn't stable.
I thought the main reason for "in service upgrades" was to allow daily 
updates to the code instead of the now popular bi-weekly ones. :-)

Pete