nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco HFR
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 19:45:48 +0300
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Reminds me of the fact that you need very little of "QoS" support if you make sure your links never come close to running full. Amazingly that´s still a very popular feature to ask for.(BTW, you'll experience very little fragmentation if you make sure your box never comes close to running out of memory.)
Pete
Current thread:
- Cisco HFR Eric Kuhnke (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Leo Bicknell (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mark Prior (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Deepak Jain (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Steven M. Bellovin (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Jared Mauch (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Adrian Chadd (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Alexei Roudnev (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Robert E. Seastrom (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Steven M. Bellovin (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Leo Bicknell (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Kurt Erik Lindqvist (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Tony Li (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Deepak Jain (May 27)
- RE: Cisco HFR Neil J. McRae (May 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cisco HFR Michel Py (May 25)