nanog mailing list archives
Re: Firewall opinions wanted please - clarification
From: Richard Cox <Richard () mandarin com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:31:44 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:18:38 -0700 "Brandon Shiers" <brandons () wyoming com> wrote:
Sonicwall makes a great product that can run in STANDARD (Proxy) mode.
As with any product, it's only as good as the support channel behind it *in your locality* ... we have just removed Sonicwall from the list of approved suppliers here because of a series of failures that left two parts of our network unprotected for several weeks (and, if any other Firewall vendors with _good_ European support are reading this thread, you're welcome to contact us by mail if you feel you can do better than Sonicwall's local representatives did ;-) ) -- Richard Cox
Current thread:
- Firewall opinions wanted please Nicole (Mar 16)
- RE: Firewall opinions wanted please - clarification Nicole (Mar 16)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] RE: Firewall opinions wanted please - clarification Brent Van Dussen (Mar 16)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please - clarification Brandon Shiers (Mar 16)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please - clarification Alexei Roudnev (Mar 16)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please - clarification Richard Cox (Mar 16)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 16)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 16)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please Rachael Treu (Mar 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please Gregory Taylor (Mar 16)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please Rachael Treu (Mar 17)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please bill (Mar 17)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please Rachael Treu (Mar 17)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please Kevin Oberman (Mar 17)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please Rachael Treu (Mar 17)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please bill (Mar 17)
- Re: Firewall opinions wanted please Rachael Treu (Mar 17)
- RE: Firewall opinions wanted please - clarification Nicole (Mar 16)