nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:16:34 -0400
In message <40D30F9E.256311EC () aset com>, "Jon R. Kibler" writes:
OK, I have obviously missed something here... I know that the courts dismissed the original complaint against ICANN, but what has happened since, and what i s this about some conspiracy? Are they trying to say that users of the anti-Si teFinder BIND patch are conspirators?
No -- but the easiest thing to do is to read the amended complaint, which is linked-to from ICANN's home page. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN, (continued)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Alexei Roudnev (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Alexei Roudnev (Jun 20)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Wayne E. Bouchard (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Patrick W Gilmore (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Jon R. Kibler (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Henry Linneweh (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN David Lesher (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN John Curran (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Vincent J. Bono (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 18)