nanog mailing list archives

Re: sniffer/promisc detector


From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:57:35 +0100


* davei () algx net (Dave Israel) [Tue 20 Jan 2004, 18:48 CET]:
On 1/20/2004 at 09:18:07 -0800, Alexei Roudnev said:
[..]
- unpatched sshd on port 30013 - safety is 7 (higher) because no one
automated script can find it, and no one manual scan find it in reality
Actually, an automated script or manual scan can find it trivially.
All you have to do is a quick port scan, looking for this:
[..]

Indeed.  And Alexei's point is that noone is looking for that.


one across the enterprise, so it is only really obscure once.  Moving
port numbers only protects you against idle vandalism; it is useless
against people who truly wish you harm.

Alexei's point also was that you need additional measures against those
people.


You really need a firewall, particularly one that can detect a port
scan and shut off the scanner, for changing ports to have any real
security.  It is kind of like a 4-digit PIN being useless for a bank
card without the 3-try limit.

Unless you like really, really sore fingers, and don't think a long line
of people waiting behind you at the ATM will attract any attention from
the bank employees.


        -- Niels.


Current thread: