nanog mailing list archives
RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck)
From: Scott McGrath <mcgrath () fas harvard edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:32:50 -0500 (EST)
You buy a OSM from Cisco and you can queue and do QoS based upon bgp index or AS Scott C. McGrath On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Michel Py wrote:
Deepak Jain wrote: With a network boot OS for each POP, you can do version control much much more easily.This is seriously flawed, IMHO. I'd encourage my competitors to do it: after the master image gets corrupted all it takes is a bozo tripping the right circuit breaker and the entire POP is kaput.QOS, priority/custom queueing are all KERNEL/underlying OS functions.This also is flawed, IMHO. What if you want to do queing or QOS based on BGP? Michel.
Current thread:
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck), (continued)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) alex (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Alexei Roudnev (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Deepak Jain (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) haesu (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) alex (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Deepak Jain (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) alex (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Deepak Jain (Jan 15)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) alex (Jan 14)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Scott McGrath (Jan 15)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) David Barak (Jan 15)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) John Ferriby (Jan 16)