nanog mailing list archives
RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck)
From: "Michel Py" <michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:23:46 -0800
Deepak Jain wrote: With a network boot OS for each POP, you can do version control much much more easily.
This is seriously flawed, IMHO. I'd encourage my competitors to do it: after the master image gets corrupted all it takes is a bozo tripping the right circuit breaker and the entire POP is kaput.
QOS, priority/custom queueing are all KERNEL/underlying OS functions.
This also is flawed, IMHO. What if you want to do queing or QOS based on BGP? Michel.
Current thread:
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Michel Py (Jan 14)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) alex (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Alexei Roudnev (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Deepak Jain (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) haesu (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) alex (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Deepak Jain (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) alex (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Deepak Jain (Jan 15)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) alex (Jan 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Michel Py (Jan 14)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Michel Py (Jan 14)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Scott McGrath (Jan 15)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Michel Py (Jan 15)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) David Barak (Jan 15)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Neil J. McRae (Jan 15)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Michael . Dillon (Jan 15)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Neil J. McRae (Jan 16)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) John Ferriby (Jan 16)