nanog mailing list archives
Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck)
From: neil () DOMINO ORG (Neil J. McRae)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:03:22 +0000 (GMT)
This also is flawed, IMHO. What if you want to do queing or QOS based on BGP?
That doesn't make any sense. You could only do the signalling for such a requirement in BGP and that isn't too hard to implement but the actual work to do QoS/queuing are in the kernel/OS/architecture irrespective of vendor or platform. Regards, Neil.
Current thread:
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck), (continued)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) alex (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Deepak Jain (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) alex (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Deepak Jain (Jan 15)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) alex (Jan 14)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Scott McGrath (Jan 15)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) David Barak (Jan 15)
- RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) John Ferriby (Jan 16)