nanog mailing list archives
imagestream vs. Cisco
From: Alex Yuriev <alex () yuriev com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:23:35 -0500 (EST)
imagestream does this, afaik. not too familiar with their offeringsthough. I stand corrected. The following page comparing Cisco and Imagestream is quite interesting. http://www.imagestream.com/Cisco_Comparison.html How many of you would buy an Imagestream box to evaluate for your next network buildout?
Imagestream uses Cisco list prices to sell their wares. No sane person that buys from Cisco pays list price. If one wants to complete with Cisco in a router business, they cannot claim that it costs $3411 to get 2x T1 router by Cisco or that 7507 chassis is $21,700. Alex
Current thread:
- Re: /24s run amuck, (continued)
- Re: /24s run amuck Sean M . Doran (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 14)
- RE: /24s run amuck Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Michael . Dillon (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Paul (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Michael . Dillon (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck David Barak (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Timothy Brown (Jan 14)
- imagestream vs. Cisco Alex Yuriev (Jan 14)
- Re: imagestream vs. Cisco Frank Louwers (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck jlewis (Jan 14)
- PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) james (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) jlewis (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Joe Abley (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Alexei Roudnev (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) james (Jan 14)
- Message not available
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) james (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) haesu (Jan 14)