nanog mailing list archives
Re: /24s run amuck
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:51:13 -0500
In message <OF933FD648.FA437A02-ON80256E1B.003A114A-80256E1B.003A552C@radianz.c om>, Michael.Dillon () radianz com writes:
The thing that surprises me is that there aren't any small vendors offering fairly generic routing boxes, i.e. Intel-basedimagestream does this, afaik. not too familiar with their offeringsthough. I stand corrected. The following page comparing Cisco and Imagestream is quite interesting. http://www.imagestream.com/Cisco_Comparison.html
Hmm -- does anyone here have one? How good a job did they do locking down Linux? --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
Current thread:
- RE: /24s run amuck, (continued)
- RE: /24s run amuck McBurnett, Jim (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Sean M . Doran (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck McBurnett, Jim (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Michael . Dillon (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Paul (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Michael . Dillon (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck David Barak (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Timothy Brown (Jan 14)
- imagestream vs. Cisco Alex Yuriev (Jan 14)
- Re: imagestream vs. Cisco Frank Louwers (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck jlewis (Jan 14)
- PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) james (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) jlewis (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Joe Abley (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Alexei Roudnev (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) james (Jan 14)