nanog mailing list archives
Re: /24s run amuck
From: Michael.Dillon () radianz com
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:39:33 +0000
The thing that surprises me is that there aren't any small vendors offering fairly generic routing boxes, i.e. Intel-based
imagestream does this, afaik. not too familiar with their offerings
though. I stand corrected. The following page comparing Cisco and Imagestream is quite interesting. http://www.imagestream.com/Cisco_Comparison.html How many of you would buy an Imagestream box to evaluate for your next network buildout? --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: /24s run amuck, (continued)
- Re: /24s run amuck Simon Leinen (Jan 15)
- Re: /24s run amuck Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck McBurnett, Jim (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Sean M . Doran (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Michael . Dillon (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Paul (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Michael . Dillon (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck David Barak (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Timothy Brown (Jan 14)
- imagestream vs. Cisco Alex Yuriev (Jan 14)
- Re: imagestream vs. Cisco Frank Louwers (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck jlewis (Jan 14)
- PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) james (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) jlewis (Jan 14)
- Re: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck) Joe Abley (Jan 14)