nanog mailing list archives
RE: /24s run amuck
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () kotovnik com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:04:15 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Michael Hallgren wrote:
On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote: Unfortunately, I've seen Peering Policies which require things like "Must announce a minimum of 5,000 prefixes". :(Wonderful... mh
Easy to fix by changing to "covering N million IP addresses" - but, then, that becomes an address space conservation issue. --vadim
Current thread:
- /24s run amuck Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 10)
- Re: /24s run amuck Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck Michael Hallgren (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck Michael Hallgren (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck Vadim Antonov (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck John Palmer (Jan 13)
- RE: /24s run amuck Michael Hallgren (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Daniel Golding (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 13)
- Message not available
- Re: router design (was Re: /24s run amuck) Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 13)
- Re: router design (was Re: /24s run amuck) Rafi Sadowsky (Jan 17)